
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1945 年5月2日,苏联红军攻占柏林,德国历史学家调查后认为,当时有10万柏林妇女被苏军强奸。5月2日,BBC播出了纪录片《柏林强暴》,揭露了这一长期被 暧昧处理的人道主义灾难。
苏军攻克柏林之 后,押着德军战俘从街道上走过。
红军攻占柏林, 对柏林妇女来说却是一场噩梦。
70 年前,二战在一片废墟中结束后,轴心国在战争中犯下的集体和个人罪行陆续得到追究、惩罚,正义得到伸张,伤痛得以抚慰。然而在战争中,盟军有意无意针对平 民造成的大规模伤害,一直被遮遮掩掩,比如德累斯顿大轰炸、东京大轰炸,以及盟军尤其是苏联红军在进入德国之后的大规模集体性侵犯。
1945 年5月2日,守卫柏林的纳粹军队投降,红军攻占柏林。战争虽然结束,但对柏林平民尤其是妇女来说,梦魇才刚刚开始。德国哥廷根大学历史研究会曾撰文称,当 时柏林被强奸的妇女达到1/3。而德国历史学家桑德斯和焦尔,曾得出过一组更为谨慎的数字:当时有10万柏林妇女被苏军强奸,其中40%的人被多次强奸。 可俄罗斯人对此的态度是,但凡提及二战时期的强奸事件,就是对他们的冒犯和无礼。
5 月2日,BBC专门播出了一期关于“柏林强暴”的纪录片节目,向世人揭露了这一长期被暧昧处理的人道主义灾难。
在 柏林郊区的特雷普托公园,有一座苏维埃战争纪念碑,由苏联建筑师设计。这里是二战时柏林战役中所牺牲的8万苏联士兵中5000人的最后安息之地。纪念碑在 1949年建成,是柏林三大苏维埃战争纪念碑之一。
柏林特雷普托公 园的苏维埃战争纪念碑。
纪 念碑上雕刻了一位站在柱基上的苏维埃士兵,他满脸严肃,左手抱着一个德国小女孩,右手持剑,脚踏在破碎的纳粹党徽上。这座雕塑高12米。据说是因为在战争 中一名3岁的德国小女孩身处险境,而一位苏军战士冒着德军的枪林弹雨,救下小女孩,所以才有了这样的雕塑。纪念碑铭文上写道,苏联人从法西斯主义手里救回 了欧洲文明。
不 过,也有人称,这座纪念碑下埋葬着某个不知名的强奸犯。二战末期,苏联苏军在东线一路杀向第三帝国,但是,无数女性也成为他们进军的受害者。
留 德学者朱维毅在著作《寻访“二战”德国兵》中写道,“德国哥廷根大学历史研究会曾撰文称, 在柏林,很多见证者根据身 边发生的事件认为,从1945年4月24日(红军攻入柏林市区)到5月5日(德军在全境停止抵抗),柏林被强奸的妇女达到1/3。而德国历史学家桑德斯和 焦尔根据多方调查,曾得出一组更为谨慎的数字:当时,10万柏林妇女被苏军强奸,其中40%的人被多次强奸。”
而 据美国历史学家威廉·希契科克(William Hitchcock)调查,有些妇女甚至被强奸60到70次之多。据事件发生几个月后不断飙升的堕胎率和当时医院的报告显示,近1万人被强奸致死。
可 是,许多俄罗斯人认为,但凡提及二战时期的强奸事件就是对他们的冒犯和无礼,强奸仿佛西方神话一般被俄罗斯媒体忽略。诚然,苏联士兵不是唯一实施性暴力的 罪犯,柏林的强奸事件也不能被孤立地看待。在此之前,纳粹军队入侵苏联,用希特勒的话来说进行的是“歼灭战”, 苏联遭受到毁灭般 的打击。
乌克兰中尉弗拉 基米尔·盖尔芬德。
尽 管关于苏军强奸的史料少之又少,民间仍然有一些遗留的文字资料得以还原当时的细节片段。两本写于1945年春季之后的日记,或许能帮助人们了解当时究竟发 生了什么。第一本日记由弗拉基米尔·盖尔芬德(Vladimir Gelfand)所写,他是来自乌克兰的犹太中尉。盖尔芬德去世后,儿子维塔利(Vitaly)在清理其文件时发现了这本日记。
随 着红军进入 “法西斯野兽的巢穴”时,苏联宣传军官挂出一条横幅鼓励红军的士气,“士兵:你们现在德国 的土地上,报复的时候到了!”
在 盖尔芬德中尉日记中,有一段骇人的记录,描述了一群德国女人逃离柏林郊区时的情景。
“ 她们脸上充满恐惧。”他写道,“她们告诉我红军抵达第一晚发生的事。一名德国女孩撩开裙子说,& lsquo;他们戳我这儿,不下 20个男人。’她失声痛哭。‘留在这里。’女孩突然勾引我,‘和我睡 觉,你可以对我做任何事,但是只可 以是你!”
盖 尔芬德描述了这名精神受到极大创伤的女孩,如何不顾一切地试图避免再次遭遇集体强奸。类似的事例在另一本日记中也有体现,这本日记的作者是一名德国女记 者,姓名不详,当时她30岁。她的日记名为《柏林的女人》(A Woman in Berlin),后来成为一本畅销书,尽管几十年来人们并不知道作者是谁。作者从1945年4月20日开始写日记,当时是希特勒自杀10天前,日记写于 “躲避炮弹轰炸的地下室”。
当 她和邻居躲在公寓地下室的时候,他们开玩笑说“被俄国佬压着,好过美国佬在头顶上飞”,意思是被苏军强奸好过被 美军轰炸。当苏联 士兵来到地下室,试图把妇女们拖出来时,她用俄语与他们交流,试图劝阻他们,然而几分钟后她就被攻击,遭到残忍的强奸。
最 终,这名作者意识到,自己需要找一只“色狼”来避免被这些“公畜”轮 奸。她与一名来自列宁格勒的高级军官上床,与他聊文学和人生的意义。
& ldquo;决不能说这名军士长在强奸我”,她写道,“我这么做是为了熏肉、黄油、糖、蜡烛或者肉罐头吗?某种 程度上来说是的。除此之外,我爱他,作为一个男人他从我这儿想要的越少,我越爱他的人格。”
1959 年该日记首次出版时,作者上述这种为了生存做出的选择,遭到德国女性的炮轰,人们称她“糟蹋自己的名誉”。
现 在,关于盟军(美、英、法国军队都有,但主要是苏军)群体强奸的最新民间研究不断涌现,然而这一人道主义灾难,渐渐成为官方话语的禁区& mdash;甚少报道,甚至更少人愿意听。
除 了社会歧视之外,在东德,批评曾打败法西斯的苏联“英雄”是亵渎神明的事情,而在一墙之隔的西德,对纳粹罪行的 愧疚,让德国人无力批评。
2008 年,改编自日记的同名电影《柏林的女人》(Anonyma)上映,在德国产生巨大影响,众多受害妇女受到鼓励勇敢站出来,其中一位就是英格博格& middot;布勒特(Ingeborg Bullert)。
现年90岁的英 格博格公开了自己1945年在柏林被强奸的经历。
现 年90岁的英格博格住在德国汉堡。苏军在柏林开始暴行时,她就像日记女作者一样躲在地窖里。然而当她上楼找绳子做灯芯时,两名苏联士兵用枪口威胁,然后强 奸了她。
英 格博格说,当时在柏林被强奸的妇女不计其数,所有15岁到55岁的女人被命令接受性传播疾病检测。“需要诊断书才能获得食品券,我记 得检测的候诊室里挤满了女人。”
这 场性暴力真正的规模可能永远无法为世人知晓。苏联军事法庭和其他来源仍然将其作为机密。俄罗斯国家杜马近期通过一项法律,规定“任何 人诋毁俄罗斯在二战期间的记录,将面临罚款和最高五年的监禁”。
盖 尔芬德中尉的儿子维塔利称,自己不否认很多苏联士兵在二战期间表现出了极大的勇气和牺牲精神,但是他希望父亲的日记今年可以出版,为公众还原更完整的事实 真相。
& ldquo;如果人们不想了解真相,他们只是自欺欺人,”他说,“整个世界明白,俄罗斯明白,那些通过新法律的 人也明白。回顾过去才能展望未来。”
【参 考资料】
1、 《寻访“二战”德国兵》,朱维毅著,同心出版社,2005年。
2、 The Struggle for Europe:The Turbulent History of a Divided Continent, 1945 to the Present(《欧洲的挣扎:分裂大陆的动荡历史,1945年到现在》),威廉·希契科克(William Hitchcock)著,2004年,尚无中译本。
3、 The Battle for Berlin in World War Two(《二战期间的柏林战役》),Tilman Remme2011年发表于BBC历史频道。(责任编辑:杨少杰)
原 标题:70年前苏军强奸了十万柏林妇女?
北 晚新视觉网版权与免责声明:
一、 凡本站中注明“来源:北晚新视觉网或北京晚报”的所有文字、图片和音视频,版权均属北晚新视觉网所有,转载时必 须注明“来源:北晚新视觉网”,并附上原文链接。
二、 凡来源非北晚新视觉网或北京晚报的新闻(作品)只代表本网传播该消息,并不代表赞同其观点。
如 因作品内容、版权和其它问题需要同本网联系的,请在见网后30日内进行,联系邮箱:takefoto@vip.sina.com。
© 北京北晚新视觉传媒有限公司 版权所有 2009-2016
© 中国新闻 2016
© 联系我们
Chinese16–17 March 2016
On 2 May 1945 the Soviet Red Army captured Berlin. German historians have estimated that about 100,000 women in Berlin were raped by Soviet troops, with 40 percent of them raped more than once. The article notes that discussion of the subject is still often regarded in Russia as offensive or as an attempt to denigrate the Soviet victory.
Seventy years ago, after the Second World War ended amid ruins, the collective and individual crimes committed by the Axis powers were gradually investigated and punished. Yet large-scale harm inflicted on civilians by the Allies, deliberately or otherwise, was long obscured. The article cites the bombing of Dresden and Tokyo and sexual violence committed by Allied troops, especially the Red Army, after entering Germany.
On 2 May 1945 the Nazi forces defending Berlin surrendered and the Red Army occupied the city. The war had ended, but for Berlin’s civilian population — especially its women — a new nightmare began. Research cited in the article says that as many as one in three Berlin women were raped. German researchers Helke Sander and Barbara Johr gave a more cautious estimate of roughly 100,000 victims, 40 percent of whom were assaulted repeatedly.
The BBC later devoted a documentary to the “rape of Berlin,” drawing wider attention to a humanitarian catastrophe that had long been treated ambiguously or kept silent.
In Treptower Park on the outskirts of Berlin stands a Soviet war memorial designed by a Soviet architect. Five thousand of the 80,000 Soviet soldiers killed in the Battle of Berlin are buried there. Completed in 1949, it is one of three major Soviet war memorials in Berlin.
The monument depicts a Soviet soldier standing on a pedestal, holding a German girl in one arm and a sword in the other while trampling a broken swastika. The statue is about twelve meters high. According to the story associated with the sculpture, a Soviet soldier rescued a three-year-old German girl under enemy fire. The inscription says that the Soviet people saved European civilization from fascism.
The article argues that behind this heroic image lies a darker side of the story. Some critics have called the memorial the “grave of the unknown rapist.” As Soviet forces fought their way into the Third Reich, many civilians — above all women — also became victims.
It cites estimates that between 24 April 1945, when Red Army forces entered Berlin, and 5 May, when resistance ceased, one third of the city’s women suffered sexual violence. It also cites American historian William Hitchcock as reporting cases in which women were raped dozens of times, while hospital reports and the sharp rise in abortions after the fighting were used to estimate deaths associated with rape.
The article adds that these discussions still provoke a painful reaction in Russia and are often interpreted as attempts to blacken the Red Army’s achievement. At the same time, it notes that sexual violence was not committed exclusively by Soviet troops and that the events in Berlin cannot be separated from the context of the war of annihilation waged by Nazi Germany in the Soviet Union.
Against this background, the diary of the young Jewish lieutenant Vladimir Gelfand is presented as an especially valuable source. His notes offer an unvarnished view of what German women experienced during the last days of the war.
Although relatively few written sources on mass rape by Soviet soldiers in Germany survive, the article highlights two diaries from the spring of 1945. The first was written by Vladimir Gelfand, a Jewish lieutenant from Ukraine. After his death, his son Vitaly found the diary among his father’s papers.
As the Red Army entered what Soviet propaganda called the “lair of the fascist beast,” propaganda slogans urged soldiers to take revenge: “Soldier! You are now on German soil. The hour of retribution has come!”
Gelfand recorded a frightening scene involving German women fleeing a Berlin suburb. “Their faces were full of fear,” he wrote. They told him what had happened on the first night after the Red Army arrived. One woman lifted her skirt and said that about twenty men had raped her in turn. Crying, she then pleaded with Gelfand to sleep with her himself — but to be the only one. The article interprets this as a desperate attempt to avoid another gang rape.
The second source is A Woman in Berlin, the diary of a German journalist who was about thirty at the time. Her identity remained unknown for many years. She began writing on 20 April 1945, ten days before Hitler’s suicide, while sheltering from shelling in a basement.
She and her neighbors joked that it was “better to have a Russian on top of you than an American overhead,” meaning that rape by Soviet soldiers seemed preferable to being killed by American bombs. When Soviet soldiers entered the shelter, however, her attempts to reason with them in broken Russian failed and she was raped.
She later concluded that she needed a “protector” in order to avoid repeated gang rape. She entered a relationship with an older Soviet officer from Leningrad, with whom she could discuss literature and the meaning of life. “One should not say that the major raped me,” she wrote. “I agreed for bacon, butter, sugar, candles and canned meat. Yes, to some extent. Besides, the less he wanted from me, the more I liked him as a person.”
When the diary was first published in 1959, its author was accused of betrayal and of dishonoring German women. Society, the article says, was not yet ready to accept the painful truth about survival amid total collapse.
Accounts of violence by Allied troops, particularly the Red Army, remained taboo for decades. The 2008 film A Woman in Berlin, based on the diary, became an important cultural event in Germany and gave a voice to women who had long remained silent.
The article also recounts the testimony of Ingeborg Bullert, then ninety and living in Hamburg. In 1945 she had sheltered in a Berlin basement. When she went upstairs to fetch a lamp wick, she encountered two Soviet soldiers who threatened her with a pistol and raped her.
Bullert recalled that women from about fifteen to fifty-five were victims of sexual violence and that women were required to undergo examinations for venereal disease. “A certificate that you had been tested was necessary to receive food ration cards,” she said. “I remember the waiting room for the examination was packed with women.”
The full scale of the catastrophe may never be known. The article says that Soviet military-tribunal documents and other sources remain classified, and it refers to Russian legislation punishing actions interpreted as discrediting the Soviet people’s wartime achievement.
Vladimir Gelfand’s son Vitaly stresses that he does not deny the heroism of Soviet soldiers who showed courage and self-sacrifice during the war. He nevertheless hopes his father’s diaries will be published in full so that a more complete picture of events can be reconstructed. “If people do not want to know the truth, they are only deceiving themselves,” he says. “Remembering the past is the road to the future.”
© Beijing Beiwang New Vision Media / China News, 2016